Markets warily eyed a bevy of inauspicious developments as September dawned, including a new COVID lockdown in China, where residents of Chengdu, home to more than 21 million people, will be subjected to mass testing beginning immediately.
“The current situation is extremely complex and severe,” local officials said. “All residents will stay at home, and non-residents of the community will not be allowed to enter,” a notice read. “There will be no crowds or gatherings in the community, and each resident can arrange one person per day to go out to buy daily necessities with a negative nucleic acid certificate within 24 hours.”
Suffice to say Xi hasn’t acquiesced to the reality of an endemic virus.
The restrictions were imposed after cases rose 14-fold, which sounds bad until you consider that the “surge” amounted to less than 1,000 total cases over 10 days. The worst day was Monday, when the city, which accounts for almost 2% of Chinese GDP, recorded 211 cases (figure below).
No other country on Earth, and certainly no major city, would bat an eye at a few hundred cases.
The restrictions threaten to further undermine China’s efforts to keep economic growth in a “reasonable range,” to employ the favored Party line. Top officials have all but abandoned this year’s 5.5% target, which most analysts viewed as wholly unrealistic following a draconian, two-month lockdown in Shanghai which, ominously, was presaged by a four-day mass testing campaign similar to that begun in Chengdu on Thursday.
For what it’s worth, I alluded to this on Sunday, when I gently suggested it’s time to “at least consider the possibility that the Party has finally reached the limits of the death-defying tightrope act they’ve so deftly managed over the past six or seven years. Beijing has proven astoundingly capable at balancing competing priorities, but it’s just not possible to reconcile “COVID zero” with a commitment to 5% growth.
As The New York Times wrote, in a good summary, China’s southwestern region “had fared relatively well over nearly three years of the pandemic,” but the situation took a turn over the past several weeks. In Chongqing, another nearby megacity, “millions of residents waited for hours in the hot sun and extreme heat while officials carried out mass testing last week.”
The “outbreaks” (with the scare quotes there to indicate that a few hundred cases in communities of 20 million only count as “outbreaks” in China) are insult to injury for the region, which is grappling with a severe heatwave and the worst drought in decades. Chengdu is the capital of Sichuan province, where drought conditions have crippled power generation. Hydroelectric plants, which generate more than three quarters of the province’s electricity, are struggling against low water levels on the Yangtze, impacting industrial production in the region. As SCMP noted, “Sichuan province normally generates almost 30% of China’s hydroelectric power, but the 2022 heatwave saw historically low water levels and, as a result, a massive drop in electricity production.”
The situation is so severe that China’s Meteorological Administration dispatched a pair of drones on an “artificial rain enhancement operation” last week. “Seeding works by dropping an ice-forming agent like silver iodide into a cloud that already contains ample moisture,” Bloomberg explained. “Rain droplets gather around the agent, gaining weight until they begin to fall.” More simply: Xi will force clouds to rain.
Already, regional plants and factories were compelled to curtail operations due to power shortages brought on by the drought. Multinationals including Volkswagen and Toyota were impacted. In Chengdu, rolling blackouts meant some neighborhoods were without electricity for nearly half the day. It was 113 degrees in Chongqing last week. Now, the area faces COVID lockdowns.
Clearly, this complicates an already fraught outlook for the world’s second largest economy, as does the prospect of more stringent virus containment measures in Shenzhen. Both the official and Caixin manufacturing PMIs printed in contraction territory for August, data out this week showed (figure below).
Lockdowns threaten to curtail non-manufacturing activity at a time when sentiment is very poor and the PBoC is at pains to stimulate domestic demand and bolster the credit impulse.
“Right now, the economy is still slowly recovering from a widespread outbreak of COVID in the first half of the year [but] local flare-ups and the punishing heat wave have disrupted the trend and created new downward pressures, posing a threat to the recovery,” Wang Zhe, Senior Economist at Caixin Insight Group, said Thursday. “Although the central bank has recently cut key policy interest rates to guide banks to lower financing costs for companies and individuals, the effect will depend on market players’ confidence about the future,” Caixin added, noting that “in the face of adverse factors such as recurring COVID cases and natural disasters, there needs to be further subsidies and assistance for poor and low-income groups amid a sluggish job market and shrinking consumer demand.”
All of this comes ahead of what will amount to a coronation ceremony for Xi, who’s set to secure a third term as leader and effectively cement a claim on a lifetime tenure atop the Party’s power structure.
More broadly, the evolving, multi-faceted crisis in China is indicative of the extent to which humanity’s problems are compounding one another. As Bloomberg wrote, citing Chengdu health commission chief Yang Xiaoguang, “extremely hot weather in the city” encouraged “frequent contact among people in indoor entertainment venues including water parks,” which in turn “led to increased transmission of the virus.”
At the same time, the drought is forcing China to fall back on coal, reminiscent of Germany’s predicament. In Germany, the world’s fourth largest economy, there’s an extra layer of tragic irony: Efforts to get coal where it needs to go are complicated by low water levels brought on by Europe’s own 500-year drought.
Unlike Germany, China can still count on Russia. “Beijing has sought to offset at least part of the lost hydropower from the drought by ramping up the use of coal-fired power plants,” the Times wrote, in a piece dated August 26 and updated this week. “China’s domestic mining of coal has been at or near record levels, and customs data shows that its imports of coal from Russia reached a new high last month.”
This all sounds unsustainable to me. At some point something has to give and Xi will pay the price for putting his people through this pain, unnecessarily.
China is absolutely out of control. Between the banking and property crisis and the handling for Covid, they’re in dire straits. They need to replace Xi. Practically speaking, they need to reach out to the world for help with Covid vaccines. If they do so, it will be an incredible business opportunity for western vaccine producers.
I’ll be curious if the CCP has the backbone to admit their failure. But actually, they don’t have to. Xi can be their scapegoat.
Its no accident that the lockdowns are imposed in the same province they have severe shortage of electricity and the demand for electric power is highest in the summer heat. So is the lockdown really due to the virus or is that just a convenient and plausible reason.
I’m not sure there’s a conspiracy here. And you seem to be convinced there is, so I don’t know that there’s much utility in trying to argue the point. When you start by stating something as a fact (i.e., “It’s no accident that…”), there’s no point in asking a question (i.e., “…is the lockdown really due?”) one sentence later. You appear to have made up your mind about it. Which is fine, but I’m just not sure why state something as unequivocally true only to turn around and pose it as a question. Either you’re sure or you aren’t.
Looks like incoming recessions about ready to occur/already happening in Europe and China. The US is probably not too far behind.
In the 4th quarter, S&P 500, which gets 30% of sales from international markets, is not going to be looking good. Commodities may have already peaked.
This is definitely not the “fun part” of what I signed up for. Luckily, I know how to be Swabian.
Here in Phoenix the Covid infection rate has retreated a bit (8666 in the last week) but it has been between ~1200 and ~2200 a day all year.
When combatting the effects of climate change by burning coal becomes harder because of climate change, maybe it’s some kind of Climate Minsky Moment.
Chongqing now on flood alert . . . not sure how serious that is. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/heat-weary-chongqing-sichuan-now-flood-alert-amid-torrential-rain-2022-08-29/
The drones worked!
As insane as China’s stringent Covid response has been, I am amazed at just how inured we’ve become. I know more people right now with Covid that at any other single point during this pandemic. These people are all vaxed and at least single boosted, have mostly mild symptoms and probably none will die. But 400 people/day are still dying here – I’m not arguing there’s much we can do about it, but just surprised how it’s become “shruggable.” 400 people/day = 150k/yr. Meh.
When I learned that 58,000 or so Americans died in Vietnam, that seemed like an insane number. It became even more insane when I lived in DC when the Vietnam Memorial went up. I remember walking those angled lengths of marble, seeing more names than I could ever read, and not being able to fathom any of it. In the very worst MONTHS of the Vietnam war, 400-600 Americans were killed in action. Now we are getting roughly that amount in DAILY Covid fatalities and we’re complaining about overbooked flights and restaurants, or Covid fatigue (not the symptom, but hearing about it).
Maybe we’re just tougher now. Or, maybe the value of life has diminished. If you’re looking for one, I think there’s your bear market.
Great points Furious One. GOP messaging has prevailed = keeping businesses open and running is the most important, perhaps only, goal.
Hello, FuriousA –
As far as I would be concerned, China is making its own bed. I have no sympathy, especially if they don’t change their policies.
Americans fought hard in tough conditions in Vietnam for almost six years. We lost 58,000+, But even a loss of one is difficult to take.
In WW2, during the three years and nine months Americans fought overseas, 405,000 were killed in Asia and Europe.
It’s all too much. Obviously, it’s a good thing to avoid war. But we have enemies, and sometimes we must respond to them.