Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today
Already have an account? log in
US Services Sector Heats Up. Inflation Pervasive
The US services sector was robust during the final month of the first quarter.
Or at least according to ISM's gauge, which printed 58.3, in line with consensus and up from February (figure below).
The prices component rose to 83.8, the second-highest in history, underscoring persistent (and likely accelerating) inflation.
The final read on S&P Global's services sector gauge for the US economy moved lower from the flash print, but at 58, remained suggestive of a brisk expansion.
The dat
Brainard missed exploding inflation a year ago, as did every member of the Fed Troop, but here we are with the same cooks in the same kitchen making the same recipe.
I personally empathize with everyone who ended up with pandemic stimulus support. I was fired from a job and benefited from government cash flow, but it stopped and I’ve tried to adapt.
What I seriously don’t understand, is the disconnect between my support being stopped, while the Fed continued a massive support effort for banks. That simplifies the dynamics if the Fed asset QE, but that’s the core issue here in terms of why the Fed didn’t reduce QE earlier.
Apparently micro tapering is going on now, but why wasn’t that effort far more aggressive a year ago? It simply seems like the pace of Fed QE was too much for too long, which greatly compounds there solution to fix the mess they created.
At this late stage, raising rates seems like using a jackhammer to thread a needle and it seems headed for failure. As for dumping all their assets at an accelerated pace, that’ll most likely turn a weak recovery and mild recession into a generational disaster, which will be compounded by an entirely new era of republican austerity and social decay. The future doesn’t look bleak it looks like a black hole colliding with a supernova.
“In addition, markets expect the Fed to lay out a plan at its May meeting for running down some of the nearly $9 trillion in assets, primarily Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities, on its balance sheet. According to Brainard’s Tuesday comments, that process will be swift.”
Wait, so you’re against the policy of the past year because it was too loose, but also against balance sheet rundown and rate hikes now?
Farmhouse,
I’m confused as to why there is a divergent difference between helping mainsteet in the form of unemployment support, versus the extended current liquidity offered to banks, who are hoarding money.
Unemployed people were denied the government teats because the economy was recovering, but as wall street turned in excessive profit gains, the Fed Test is still drizzling with nonstop juice. That weaning imbalance doesn’t make sense, because the Fed is purposefully fattening banks with taxpayer milk.
A lot of QE is hard to fathom, and I’m not entirely exactly sure of the macro picture of how the Fed asset programs filter down to poor people like me, but as I said, I’m confused.
While I’m here, here’s an interesting collection of thoughts provided by our neighbors at the Washington Post:
Inflation has Fed critics pointing to spike in money supply
But central bank officials say economy has changed since high-inflation days of the 1970s
By David J. Lynch
February 6, 2022 at 9:2
The money supply is growing at a 13 percent annual rate, which until the pandemic was the fastest growth since the late 1970s. Even if the Fed acts quickly to cut that increase in half, annual inflation will top 6 percent through 2024, said Hanke.
“It’s like a doctor. If you have a defective thermometer, your prescription could be way off,” said Hanke. “The Fed’s thermometer is defective.”
The money supply went up, but the velocity went down,” said former Treasury official David Beckworth, now with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. “They’ve parked it. They’re not spending it
Hanke said the problem lies with the Fed’s metrics: The Divisia measure shows that the money supply grew much less during that period than the traditional data suggests. But he acknowledges he has made few converts at the central bank.
My smartphone changes many things, like converting your name and the word t e a t
I’ve given up on editing stuff. It wasn’t me
The phone overrides some corrections, my apologies.
In comments today, Mary Daly soft-pedals a soft landing with two words. She still doesn’t “see” a recession, but thinks the economy “could teeter, but nothing that tips us into recession this year” Ah, well, yes, not this year…