You Are Not Capital. You Just Think You Are

You Are Not Capital. You Just Think You Are

It's becoming apparent that between the general public's apathy, aversion to what I'll call "scare" words (e.g., "socialism" and "Progressive") and a GOP that's suddenly against corporate free speech and has conveniently rediscovered its commitment to budget rigor now that the party doesn't control government, it's possible America will fail to meet the challenge of modernizing the world's largest economy. If that modernization effort were to fail, America's won't be the largest economy for lon
Every story you need, no story you don't. It's that simple. Get the best daily market and macroeconomic commentary anywhere for less than $7 per month. Subscribe or log in to continue.

13 thoughts on “You Are Not Capital. You Just Think You Are

  1. This game of monopoly is very close to its inevitable end. Time to box it up, take it out back and burn it. It was never a good game and it never will be. If not we will all be forced to sit around the table with the gloating winner for eternity.

    No one/dozen/hundred human(s) deserves to helm humanity no matter how well they won a game of skill or cunning or luck or brutality. We have likely less than 5 years until Jeff Bezos is the 7th Trillionaire in history, up there with Genghis Khan and Augustus Caesar. I suspect that’s about as close to an event horizon as you get.

  2. There are about 615 billionaires in the USA, who have aggregate wealth of about $4T. The USD/assets held by this group, for the most part, does not circulate through our domestic economy. There are also USD held by “foreigners” who are also very wealthy people and these USD, also for the most part, do not circulate in our domestic economy.
    So far, Congress has handed out about $4T in various stimulus packages in 2020/21. Interesting that it equals the amount held by US billionaires, although doubtful there is a correlation.
    A progressive estate tax would bring those USD sitting largely idle in the hands of those 615 individuals back into circulation.
    Will Congress do that? They would upset so few people (615)?

    1. Need a wealth tax. It would kick in immediately rather than waiting for Bill, Elon et al to pass on. Second it is much easier to plan to avoid taxes triggered on a single event than a simple tax based on one’s net worth as an economic reality. I’m sure there would still be some avoidance but it would be more difficult.

    1. And the result is (what has ended up being) the definition of violent, political revolution. This is a future where people are not the change they seek whereas now people are not the capital they think they seek to be.

  3. Capital disproportionately generates capital and that’s a weakness of capitalism as it’s currently practiced and that generates extremes in unequal wealth distribution. Capitalism needs to be reimagined so that a larger proportion of capital flows to labor and therein lies the issue that has driven the search for alternative economic systems through the ages. We may be past the time when an individual can write a book and spawn a new type of human governance. If so, is it possible for humans to do this in groups as large as a nation? That question does not give me the warm and fuzzies. Homo Deus anyone?

  4. America is hollowed out. No new ideas. No purpose. No plan. People are confused.

    All the while, America has been run into a ditch. The elites just didn’t care. America doesn’t matter to them except as a vessel to extract wealth from, from both the land and the people, including all of us reading these fine articles.

    One observation that never seems to strike Americans after they return to America, after, say a visit to a European city, is why there are heavy, iron grilles and bars, however ornamental, on first-floor windows of many government buildings and residences. Gee, let me see, why would that be?

    Even recent edition “official” buildings seem somewhat fortified, maybe easy to defend, and have more mass at street level.

    A specific example of this is next time one is in London, walk through The City, and knock on the stone, at street level, of the newer buildings. The building is steel and concrete at it’s core and not with a thin, stone veneer skin.(Sure, they realize in London that building is expensive, best to do it right the first time.) A knock on the veneer of similar-purpose building in America rings thin.

    I try not to get depressed about this stuff.

  5. Very well written article. It should be outside the paywall. Hint hint.

    It’s interesting to think about what would have happened had we not had the antitrust laws of the early 1900s.

    We would all today be working for the descendants of Cornelius Vanderbilt. And by all of us, I mean all of us, including Bezos, Musk, and Gates.

    We have replaced one set of monopolists with another, and it’s time that we reinvoke those same laws.

    We don’t need kings today for the same reason that we did not need kings in 1776. I prefer democracy, thank you very much. It’s better than the alternative.

  6. H

    Another great post. It’s suddenly ironic to me that you refer to the Bloomberg “Billionaires List.” I remember when that list belong to Forbes. But now Bloomberg is a lot richer than Forbes so Mike gets to do the list now. Interesting.

    I wish I had read this post about two hours ago because I sent the same general sentiment in a rant to a former classmate who is a Trumpist conspiracy believer, a striver who thinks he matters to his group of political hacks without realizing that even they don’t matter to the 25 people who really count. It’s not the new world order that folks like my friend think is scary, it’s the real thing on Bloomberg’s list that is actually scary. I’m told the Indians (Hindus) have a saying that goes something like: “When elephants fight, the grass dies.” I hate being the grass. I could have saved a bunch of time this morning by sending a couple of the best quotes from this post.

  7. Is it as simple as ‘there are just way too many people on this planet’?? And because of the overload, human induced climate change and destruction of our natural support system is going to fix the problem, because the solution is either so far from do-able that we can’t comprehend what is required, or so simple but so destructive that it shouldn’t be contemplated?? And if the last 25 people on earth each have a mountain of dollars, it won’t matter because if the environment is unlivable their money will be worthless and they will all end up like the paupers. Shame really. (Now, if there really is a God, would he/she intervene or just shrug his/her shoulders and acknowledge a failed experiment.)

  8. Excellent article, thanks a lot!
    Thanks also for the McMansion reference, btw, I just spent abt. 1 hour browsing the truly excellent McMansionHell blog. 😉
    (almost forgot that site existed)

Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints