central banks

Chart Of The Day: Central Bank Intervention For Dummies

A "clearly illustrated phenomenon."

It’s become readily apparent to me lately that retail investors do not appreciate the extent to which the returns they’ve enjoyed since 2009 are directly attributable to central bank largesse.

Normally, we could just write that off as harmless naiveté, but at this point it’s dangerous. Most investors have no conception whatsoever of the extent to which their performance is in no way, shape, or form a product of their own acumen but rather an inevitable consequence of the rising central bank tide that’s lifted all boats.

This will end in (a shit load) of tears when the punchbowl is pulled away and suddenly, every newsletter purveyor and homegamer-turned-self-described-guru discovers that this was all an illusion.

Well, in an effort to drive that point home, here’s a chart from BofAML which should (and I emphasize “should” because at least half of the people who read this still won’t get it) be an idiot-proof visualization of exactly what’s going on here.

This is credit implied vols annotated with colors (basically) to indicate periods of central bank intervention and periods where they’ve stepped away.


Here’s BofAML to explain that for anyone who still doesn’t understand:

Global monetary policies (tightening or expanding) have a profound impact on the credit implied vol market. Chart 8 clearly illustrates this phenomenon. Every time the Fed embarked on the different phases of its QE programme, credit implied vols declined materially. On the other hand, during periods of no policy or when the market started pricing the possibility of policy removal (tapering tantrum and the subsequent tapering phase) implied vols advanced.

Got it?



2 comments on “Chart Of The Day: Central Bank Intervention For Dummies

  1. lesson for the central banks is just to use a bottomless punch bowl

  2. Curt Tyner

    Well there you have it, damned if you do and damned if you don’t. Yes the central banks have painted themselves in the proverbial corner. The 1st problem is to hand out more corporate welfare (priming the pump) having to spend about $4 for every $1 in GDP and add more debt to THE DEBT PROBLEM we already have. The 2nd problem is turning off our free money addiction and that will start the death throes of a fiat money, market manipulated scam which we (American public) will pay for one way or another. Sound good sign me up!

Speak On It

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar