Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today
Already have an account? log in
Trump Raises Specter Of Constitutional Crisis Over Tariff Refund
You gotta hand it to him. I don't know what "it" is on some days, but it's something. Something to d
You can’t make this stuff up, though it seems Trump now just makes everything up. I’m not sure even Spock would attempt a brain meld with him.
I wondered what it would be like, inside Trump’s head. Now we know it is a vast unknown, getting older and more senile by the hour.
I have little doubt Trump and his cronies will find a way to ignore SCOTUS and any ruling declaring his precious tariffs illegal under IEEPA, the rule of law is just a nuisance for them, sadly most people in America will not care.
This feels like the Liberation Day thing all over, as Trump attempts to exact his pound of flesh from all perceived enemies. TACO at 20% down on the Dow again?
H-Man, Ginsburg on Trump:
He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego…
There’s a point at which even a guy like Teflon Don gets too far out over his skis. Ask Icarus. The more Trump implicitly threatens SCOTUS to do his bidding, the more likely SCOTUS is to rule sharply against him and anticipate his post-ruling shenanigans. The Court may have no choice but to explicitly describe various actions POTUS may contemplate taking and their consequences, as well as describing clearly Congress’s responsibilities. The nondelegation doctrine provides a foundation for SCOTUS to rule against POTUS, describe Congress’s past Constitutional laziness (or malfeasance) on tariff legislation, and highlight Congress’s responsibility to raise it’s game on tariffs and others matters of import when a wannabe autocrat becomes Pres.
Never mind. SCOTUS may rule against Trump on tariffs, but the conservatives on the Court don’t have the guts to describe the bigger autocratic picture as it is to Congress or POTUS.
A narcissist, who is so extreme, that he would never even recognize, let alone acknowledge, his narcissistic motivations. His only motivations for everything he does is power, recognition, revenge, diminishing others and money. If anyone/anything else benefits from his actions, that is just a byproduct.
Something weird must have happened during his upbringing.
I am almost finished reading “The Power Broker”- so this personality trait is front and center in my mind.
Your use of the word “weird” is spot on. Lots of room for imaginations to fill in the space.
Trump has a very simple remedy: have Congress approve his Tariffs.
He could have done it in the first place if was willing to be slightly less autocratic and slightly more willing to actually work.
I think we’re all being a little too naive about this Supreme Court. I am quite sure the partisan leadership of this court has done the calculation and understands the dangers of ruling against Trump as described above. They also seem to support the concept of autocratic rule in the US vis a vis the Unitary Executive theory. This makes me believe that there is no way they actually go through with ruling against Trump, the effects would be devastating to the current state of GOP politics of which they are major players and benefactors. They would rather allow illegality to continue than to destroy the project they’ve invested 5 decades into building.
All at our expense of course, but I doubt any of them will ever see it that way.
The zeitgeist is certainly leaning towards SCOTUS ruling against the president’s use of IEEPA for imposing blanket tariffs, so I wouldn’t bet against that outcome, at least not without odds. Still, one should always remember: John Roberts is a coward.
In the appellate courts, the government said tariffs should not be enjoined, because they could always be refunded if a higher court found them invalid. That surely has not escaped the Supreme Court’s attention.