Nvidia Has ‘Central Bank-Like Power’ In Modern Markets

Earlier this month, I described the size (and, by extension, the index influence) of Nvidia’s daily market-cap swings as “farce.”

It was an apt description. By now, a history of the largest single-session value creation bonanzas and biggest one-day wipeouts is just the record of Nvidia ca. 2023/2024.

At various intervals since May of 2023 — when the company changed the world with what it’s probably fair to call the most famous beat and raise in history — market observers have joked that the S&P 500 is really just the “S&P One.” Personally, I don’t think that joke’s very funny. Because on some days, it’s true, and that’s terrifying.

Take September 11, 2024, for example. Mid-week, the S&P and the Nasdaq 100 swooned in the wake of a warmer-than-expected read on core consumer price growth in the US, but by session’s end, both benchmarks had successfully pared large intraday declines to close sharply higher. The turnaround catalyst was Nvidia and, naturally, flows.

The figure below shows you the mid-week market cap gain for Jensen Huang’s miracle machine.

Nothing to see here everybody, just another $216 billion single-session swing.

The rally was courtesy of Huang himself who, while regaling a packed house at a Goldman tech conference, said demand for his products is “so great” that customers are getting “emotional,” creating “tense” relationships between the company and its buyers. “We’re trying to do the best we can,” he said.

That’s obviously ridiculous — not in the sense that Huang’s exaggerating, but precisely because he probably isn’t — but it helped rekindle investors’ AI joie de vivre, which waned following Nvidia’s earnings release late last month.

Huang’s remarks served as “confirmation” of Larry Ellison’s unbridled bullishness from earlier this week. Ellison — whose net worth rose by $14 billion in a single day following Oracle’s results, vaulting him over Bill Gates on Bloomberg’s demigods list — described “an ongoing battle for techn[ological] supremacy that will be fought by a handful of companies and maybe one nation state over the next five years at least, but probably more like 10.” “There’s no slowdown or shift coming,” he told investors.

As one Nomura PM cited on Thursday by the bank’s Charlie McElligott noted, this isn’t just suppliers talking their books. At the same Goldman event, both Microsoft and Amazon soundly equally excited (assuming that’s possible when the excited bar’s set by Huang) which, as Charlie put it, suggests there’s currently “no limit on what they’re willing to spend due to the importance of [the AI] theme across their businesses.”

And so, Nvidia rallied hard, pulling the entire market along for the raucous ride. McElligott called it an “NVDA–induced equities FOMO euphoria.” “The world’s largest wealth creation machine went into overdrive and fed into a virtuous feedback loop across the reality of today’s market structure,” he wrote.

The figures show you the share of September 11’s rally attributable to Nvidia. The stock single-handedly accounted for 44% of the S&P’s mid-week gain.

Just as important, in my view anyway, as Nvidia’s mathematical contribution to the index gain was the read-through of the shares’ march higher for flows.

“The outsized moved in the single-name set off a cacophony of accelerant flows with both real and synthetic negative gamma creating more buying of shares the higher the underlying stock travelled via options market maker-hedging” on calls they’re short to clients, in addition to “the prolific importance which NVDA has across the largest components of the leveraged ETF space,” Charlie wrote.

The figures below, with helpful annotations from McElligott, give you a sense of these dynamics.

Nvidia apparently accounted for nearly $1 of every $4 of options traded on September 11.

So, that’s it. That’s what makes a rally these days: Nvidia plus modern market structure gets you sessions like Wednesday’s.

McElligott summed it up as only he can. “When a name of this magnitude sees an outsized move, there will be a large mechanical impact from its index weighting knocking across the entire ecosystem,” he wrote, describing September 11’s trade as the “latest expression of Nvidia’s central bank-like power.”


 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 thoughts on “Nvidia Has ‘Central Bank-Like Power’ In Modern Markets

    1. I sold 90% of my Nvidia position at $120. It was really starting to feel “unhinged”. The ride was amazing, but I am trying to be a responsible adult, so I locked in gains (thankfully that position was all in an IRA- I hate paying taxes).
      And I still get a little “thrill” from my remaining position.

      1. A few years ago, before anyone cared about NVDA and all this associated junk, I bought the stock for less than $100 and watched it climb to around $550 and stall a bit. I only had 100 shares (pre-split, of course) so I sold and spread the money around. They were still a “chip” company not an “AI” giant. We all make mistakes.

        1. We’ve been long since 2018 – when it was a gaming/crypto/automotive play… but a fairly modest ticket at the time. We re-upped a couple of times along the way but… ‘could have/’should have done more… 😉

  1. From his quoted comment here, I’m not sure Ellison fully understands the contours of the “battle” for technological supremacy here, if he’s lumping China’s intentions (and methods) in with those of the tech titans.

  2. A headline piece in the DigiTimes (Taiwan) this morning expressed astonishment that the second half sales of AI-empowered notebook computers looked to only match (non-AI) sales in the first half. It appears that end-users are not yet seeing the need to pay up for a new notebook simply to add AI capability. America’s favorite company, Apple, may have noticed something like this when they chose to leave iPhone 16 prices flat.

    It’ll come, but at what price points and what margins?

    Apropos that, yesterday I received an advert from Zoom telling me that they were rolling out enhanced AI transcription etc features. At no extra cost to us. It brought to mind some quotes from the software consultant here that end-user companies will feel compelled to to offer AI products to retain customers. So tech companies will obilge them with datacenter buildouts. Which they can afford as well as write-off when paying taxes.

    But stepping back to think about this…. maybe Elison is right. Zoom has been compelled to offer AI options at no cost to their customers because that is what their primary competitor is doing. At first I chuckled and thought of the the old “hand out drugs to kids on elementary school playgrounds to make them customers for life” business strategies. But this is a very uneven fight. How can any smaller also-ran conferencing firm stand a chance in that market?

Create a free account or log in

Gain access to read this article

Yes, I would like to receive new content and updates.

10th Anniversary Boutique

Coming Soon