A Milestone Abstention

On Monday, Washington sent an unequivocal message about America’s commitment to safeguarding innocents caught in conflict zones.

Never a nation to put political expediency over principle, the US took the bold step of — checks notes — not vetoing a resolution demanding the cessation of a massacre.

Hopefully, you’re picking up on the sarcasm. Joe Biden’s countenancing (indeed, he’s facilitating) a collective punishment campaign in Gaza, where Benjamin Netanyahu’s subjecting the populace to systematized slaughter in pursuit of an unachievable military objective.

This (the slaughter) was inevitable, by the way. I said as much in the days following the October 7 Hamas attacks, and I lost more than a few readers for my trouble. Obfuscate as Netanyahu will, but the Israeli right’s narrative is straightforward. It goes like this. There’s a threshold for brutality and barbarism beyond which collective punishment’s acceptable. Hamas crossed that threshold during a day of rape, pillage and indiscriminate murder. So much the worse for Gazans.

That’s what this comes down to. Inescapably. Maybe you agree with that narrative. If so, have some courage: Admit it. To yourself and to everyone else. And when you do, exhort the rest of us to be equally honest: If those were our mothers, sisters and daughters on October 7, we might support collective punishment in Gaza too.

That’s the (exceedingly harsh) reality of the situation. The problem for Biden and the US is that supporting (even tacitly) collective punishment isn’t just unacceptable in polite company, it’s unacceptable in impolite company on the Security Council at a time when American foreign policy vis-à-vis two of the P5’s leans heavily on Washington’s (already farcical) pretensions to the moral high ground.

Here’s a nation (America) regaling the world with tales of Russian war crimes in Ukraine and openly accusing China of genocide against the Uyghurs, not only declining to place limits on weapons shipments to a military engaged in what Biden himself described as an “indiscriminate” bombing campaign, but refusing even to abstain from a vote demanding a humanitarian ceasefire that might bring some relief to a population coping with the ever-present threat of death from the sky and facing the prospect of starvation.

In addition to being morbidly hypocritical (and thereby highly amenable to exploitation by state propaganda apparatuses in Russia and China), this recently took on an air of tragicomedy when, rather than instruct Netanyahu to desist from perpetuating a famine, the US instead decided to build a temporary sea port for the delivery of aid. So, the US will provide Israel with money and weapons to wage a collective punishment campaign, then turn around and spend more money to ameliorate the impact of that campaign. Small wonder American foreign policy is such an easy target for the likes of Maria Zakharova and her Chinese counterpart Hua Chunying.

And so it was that the US on Monday mustered the fortitude to abstain from a vote on a measure demanding an immediate halt to the fighting in Gaza during Ramadan. The US abstention cleared the way for the Security Council to approve a ceasefire resolution for the first time since the war started. The body also called for the unconditional release of the remaining hostages, but didn’t make the ceasefire demand contingent on Hamas freeing the captives, a stinging rebuke to Israel.

The history of the fraught effort to secure a ceasefire resolution includes three US vetoes and two from Russia and China, who refused US drafts which Moscow and Beijing deemed too vague regarding the Council’s expectations for the cessation of hostilities.

“Finally — finally — the Security Council is shouldering its responsibility,” Algeria’s ambassador exclaimed, after the vote.

Conflicting reports suggested Netanyahu might’ve canceled plans for an Israeli delegation to visit the US. Biden summoned Israeli representatives to hear The White House’s concerns about a military operation in Rafah where, on the IDF’s estimates, as many as 8,000 Hamas fighters are hiding among more than a million Gazans.

Russia, without so much as a hint of irony to account for that other war, tried unsuccessfully to add an amendment to Monday’s resolution stipulating that the halt for Ramadan lead to a “permanent” ceasefire.

An irritable Netanyahu said Biden’s abstention marked a “retreat from the consistent American position since the beginning of the war.” Yes, Mr. Prime Minister. That’s the whole point.


 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

4 thoughts on “A Milestone Abstention

  1. My limited and fairly unknowing mind continues to be struck by the parallels between our 9/11 and Israel’s 10/7. An abject intelligence failure based not on lack of knowledge or awareness, but lack of action and execution. A completely disproportionate response, stoked by misinformation or exaggeration — our hysteria over yellowcake and Israel’s over “weaponized rape.” The rationale to destroy the enemy over “there” to preclude it from ever coming “here” again, and even if innocent civilians were in the way. The defiant posture of either you are with us or against us, and keep your questions and criticisms to yourself lest you be tarred unpatriotic or antisemitic. Not sure where we are exactly in the analogy right now, but Google tells me this is what “Mission Accomplished” looks like in Hebrew. “?????? ??????”

  2. Nothing that happened at the UN has any significance. It’s a non-binding (it would only be binding if the UN invaded Israel and defeated it) resolution and netanyahoo has already said he’ll disregard it. We theoretically could sanction Israel, but AIPAC & DMFI will prevent that. So, it’s a non-event.

  3. The US was officially established as a sovereign nation in 1789, only 235 years ago. Having been born in the first half of the 20th century, I have been alive for a third of this country’s very short life. During both mine and our country’s lifetimes, the US has had the worst foreign policy of any major nation on the planet, from the Barbary Pirates (the shores of Tripoli) to the Monroe Doctrine (the Halls of Montezuma) to the present day we have backed more anti-heroes, dictators, war criminals and their ilk, than almost anyone else. Every time we seem to get stuck on the wrong side (maybe with the exception of WWI, although we were officially Russia’s and China’s ally then) and find ourselves having to switch sides. Because of my age, the ultimate irony is that after having to depart Vietnam, having sacrificed an enormous amount in human lives and treasure, we have quietly accepted hundreds of thousands of their citizens as our citizens and made their country a major trading partner. So now we come to that fateful abstention. How the hell are we going to get out of this one? We can’t can’t be seen to create a regime change in this new very public world of ours, although we are still vain enough to believe the rest of the world cares who we are or what we do. The only thing left for us is that we have this office where they make the Benjamins (named for our last true statesman and the man who got France to help save our baby country); oh and as Neal Stephenson pointed out in Snow Crash, we do excel above all others at 30 minute pizza delivery.

Create a free account or log in

Gain access to read this article

Yes, I would like to receive new content and updates.

10th Anniversary Boutique

Coming Soon