Trump Completes GOP Conquest As Mitch McConnell Abdicates

Mitch McConnell’s a lot of things, but naive isn’t one of them.

And naive right now would be to persist in the fantasy that there’s anything left of the Republican party as Americans came to understand and define it from Ronald Reagan forward. That party’s nearly as dead as the Gipper himself, and nobody knows that better than the Senate’s self-proclaimed “grim reaper.”

“I have many faults. Misunderstanding politics is not one of them,” McConnell said Wednesday, announcing that although he plans to remain in the chamber he’s worked so hard to paralyze through the end of his term, he won’t stand for the Republican leadership after the election.

“Believe me, I know the politics within my party at this particular time,” McConnell went on, explaining his decision which, despite not coming as a surprise, nevertheless counts as a watershed of sorts. McConnell’s abdication comes less than three months after Kevin McCarthy quit the House. Although both men managed through Donald Trump’s presidency, neither proved especially adept at curbing the GOP’s rightward lurch.

That latter assessment would’ve been nonsensical in the context of pre-Trump McConnell and McCarthy who, between them, were pretty far to the right on most key issues, if not all them. But “right” means something different now. Although Trumpism retains some tenets of Republicanism, overlap is harder to come by than it was just a couple of years ago. Shared principles are mostly confined to supply-side economic “reforms,” and specifically tax cuts. Outside of that, Trumpism doesn’t have a lot in common with GOP orthodoxy, especially not on matters of foreign policy. That’s where McConnell apparently saw a chasm too wide to bridge.

McConnell supports additional aid to Ukraine and generally espouses the notion that US national security is synonymous with America’s post-War global police role, wherein “maintaining a rules-based world order” is a euphemism for military interventions and blowing things up more generally. Credit where it’s due: Trump’s unequivocally right to suggest the US should dial it back in that regard. The issue in 2024 is that Trump may not be a completely unbiased observer when it comes to the war in Ukraine. As such, there are legitimate questions about whether the Trump wing’s reluctance to sign off on additional aid to Kyiv might be a reflection of ulterior motives.

“Moscow” memes aside, McConnell’s uncomfortable with that situation. He’s already the longest-serving Senate leader in US history. Mission accomplished there. By announcing that he won’t stand for leader again, he’s effectively robbed the Trump wing of leverage: He no longer needs to court favor among the party’s extremist elements. Those elements are mercifully fewer in the Senate, but they’re present, and McConnell doesn’t have to pander to them now. On Ukraine or on anything else.

Please, I implore readers: Don’t misconstrue my message. I’m not suggesting that Mitch McConnell’s any sort of hero, nor that he’s made a late-career choice to do some good for the country or the world. You won’t find a more ardent Mitch McConnell critic than me. All I’m saying is precisely what Hakeem Jeffries said Wednesday in remarks to The New York Times: “It is probably the case that on his way toward retirement, he’s going to work as hard as he can to make sure that the national security bill gets over the finish line in the House and the Senate to President Biden’s desk.”

McConnell suffered several high-profile public lapses in recent months. For lack of a medical degree, all I can say about those incidents is that Mitch simply stopped working mid-sentence and had to be reset. In all likelihood, whatever’s behind those episodes would’ve forced McConnell out of the leadership role sooner rather than later anyway, but his preemptive announcement was most notable, in my view, for representing the GOP’s final capitulation to Trump.

McConnell offered an appeal of sorts on Wednesday to the party he once controlled with adroit Machiavellian guile. “I believe more strongly than ever that America’s global leadership is essential to preserving the shining city on a hill that Ronald Reagan discussed,” he said.


 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 thoughts on “Trump Completes GOP Conquest As Mitch McConnell Abdicates

  1. I would say that Mitch was pretty ill, I saw his speech and he looked shaky. But there was an element of wounded (politically as well as physically) aspect to quitting as leader. Had McConnell not quit the jackals in his caucus probably would have come after him after November – whether Trump won or lost and whether it was to be in the majority or minority in the Senate. The minority leader in the Senate has a lot of power, unlike the minority leader in the House. So whoever comes in will have a fairly large political stick on the Republican side regardless of the election outcome. There will likely be at least 4 viable candidates for Republican Senate leader in January.

  2. He voted to acquit Trump after January 6th, with full intelligence on what happened and well aware of the precedent and consequences.
    The Republicans have torn themselves apart after being hijacked and I hope they lose many general elections (though given it’s a 2 party system not much will change).

  3. My take is that McConnell decided he likes his money (or at least his wife’s money) more than he likes his power. And while I agree this marks a watershed, it also seems transactional — I’ll step down if you lay off my wife (and maybe help revive that plan for a Russian aluminum plant in Kentucky). But once he steps down, my guess is Mitch will once again learn the hard way that loyalty for Trump flows in only one direction (towards him), and soon enough we’ll be hearing more about the China-loving Coco Chow.

Create a free account or log in

Gain access to read this article

Yes, I would like to receive new content and updates.

10th Anniversary Boutique

Coming Soon