Fed May Need To Torch $30 Trillion To Tame Inflation

The Fed's credibility problem is beginning to grow again. And no, I don't mean the Austan Goolsbee soap opera. Allow me a quick word on that, though. Everybody's a partisan in America, and the selection process for top jobs of all sorts is fraught with conflicts on interest, some of which are so egregious as to be wholly laughable. Who knew, right? If we want real technocrats, in the strictest sense of the term, and relatedly, if we want totally unbiased Supreme Court Justices, we'd have to r

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today for as little as $7/month

View subscription options

Or try one month for FREE with a trial plan

Already have an account? log in

Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

12 thoughts on “Fed May Need To Torch $30 Trillion To Tame Inflation

  1. “But, from a 30,000-foot view, we seem to be getting perilously close to some kind of reckoning where everyone runs out of excuses”. Right. Which can only happen when mainstreet runs out of money (equity in their homes)

  2. Powell @ recent fomc,bostic this week were reckless with their statements not caring about the fci easing in the markets. Trying to get into their minds, starting to wonder if thats how they r attempting the softlanding. With contracting M2, terminal rates at ~5-ish,continuing qt but spx >4500 (by next month & trending further up later) is softlanding + 2% target inflation (sometime down the line) possible? i strongly doubt but may be therez a slight possibility.
    coming back to this article “fed deliberately destroying the 30$ trillion excess wealth” ? no way, not even close, why coz of the monstrous debts in the system, it causes contagion credit events. Even at the slightest chance that the inflation peaked and its under control, they will pause, next pivot & finally another round of mmt, Qe will be coming. main reason why is there is no other practical feasible solution (for them) to this. market knows this

    1. FWIW, I think the Fed is doing a very good job of draining liquidity from the system: not too slow, not too fast, kinda just right.I’m an unabashed Jay Powell fan, and if he’s left alone to do his job as spelled out
      in the Federal Reserve act, I think he’ll go down as one of the greatest Fed chairs of all time.

  3. i wonder, what happens if the Fed does drop the 2% inflation target. surerly, current asset prices will look dirt cheap then?

    1. Relatively speaking, Lina Khan has been excellent — the first FTC chair in forty years to actually take her role seriously.

  4. Instead of an indiscriminate destruction of $30T of wealth that hits all sectors and wealth brackets, why not a well-aimed tax increase – probably much smaller – at the beneficiaries of the bulk of that inflation?

    1. I completely agree. A blanket 15% minimum tax on the wealthy would help to address the deficits we’re discussing here. The Trump tax cut was a gift to the wealthiest Americans who had no need for it.

      In response to Fatmoose as to how and when to pass it, never is a long time. FDR II (Biden) is not unlikely to have a majority in the House after 2024, thanks to Kevin McCarthy and Jim Jordan. The bigger question is what happens in the Senate.

  5. ,” there’s $26 trillion in “extra” household
    wealth competing for goods and services, the provision of which is hampered by lingering supply
    chain distortions exacerbated by commodities volatility and an acute worker shortage,
    respectively. ” This is exactly the problem, and since we can’t wave a magic wand to fix it, we are in a
    bind !

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints