Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

22 thoughts on “Playing With Fire

  1. n.b. International students make up about 27 percent of Harvard’s total enrollment with more than 6,700 international students enrolled at the university as of fall 2024. [Source: Politico]

    6700 students were just told to gtfo of Harvard, one of the most prestigious universities on the planet, or lose their legal status.

  2. I’m glad you brought this up. It was the case that one usually only had to worry about political risk as a financial concern in emerging economies and never in the US. Not so anymore.

  3. Your basic premise–that Trump’s continued attacks on the rule of law will tank the U.S. financial and equity markets is correct and (slowly) happening. But in more than one observation you accept at least in part (or tolerate) the false (and dangerous) notion that criticism of Israeli politics and its dramatic acceleration of the 100-year war against the Palestinian people is “anti-semitism.” That’s crap, pure and simple. Palestinian leadership has historically been worse than incompetent. That does not sanction military policies that are clearly genocide–ironically making the Israeli leadership no different that Nazi war criminals. /s/ Jews from Minsk

    1. “…you accept at least in part (or tolerate) the false (and dangerous) notion that criticism of Israeli politics and its dramatic acceleration of the 100-year war against the Palestinian people is ‘anti-semitism.’”

      Are you new here? That’s a serious question. I don’t accept that at all, and the fact that you’d suggest I do is proof positive that you haven’t read my coverage of the war in Gaza.

      1. I’m guessing that the comment author isn’t the well-known David Axelrod, because my fleeting sense of the man is that he wouldn’t have written such a statement without at least having a quote to back it up. I HAVE been a long time reader, so I have read plenty of your coverage of the war in Gaza and agree with you wholeheartedly. But for me, the weird thing is that I went back and re-read THIS article — twice, looking for what prompted his response in the first place. I’m just not seeing it.

        Honestly, these days when I see unprovable statements such as his I just chalk it up to Russian, Chinese or maybe domestic agent provocateurs. Maybe too dismissive on my part, but there it is.

    1. I’m not calm. I’m incredibly upset, scared, and angry. I would fly to DC at a moment’s notice to participate in something like a million man march. As far as what it’s going to take: leadership. Someone has to galvanize the populace to take action.

  4. I expect that much of Trump’s actions against Harvard will be blocked in litigation. His prior blanket recission of student visas under the SEVIS program was blocked, and Harvard will be a formidable legal opponent.

    But H’s point stands. Seeing the US President do anything he wants, flout any right or contract, throw any business or entity into disarray, even if the action is eventually blocked or reversed, does not encourage investment in the US. EQNR will surely think twice before undertaking any projects here, or will demand a hefty risk premium, and so will others, be they international students or international companies.

    What about stock and bond investors? The latter, being generally smarter than the former, seem to be starting to exact their premia. Stock investors are not – yet. Individual ones may, but the structural flow of money toward US stocks from retail, retirement, buybacks, carry has yet to really be dented.

    I’m wondering what effect the Supreme Court’s dicta on Powell’s job security has on the risk premium.

    1. Businesses, markets and international relations do best when there is stability which has been key to US 20th century economic dominance. We created a world order dependent upon consistent US behavior. Trump 1 was a shock, but expected to be short and with no permanent damage. Now no one anywhere can be certain about the direction the US will take. There is no safe compass direction. Add in climate change and there doesn’t seem to be safe harbor anywhere. What’s the time period now for a buy and hold strategy.

  5. At this point my expectation is that whatever’s left of the US china shop after this bull exits will result in austerity measures for those of us who still are alive and live here. The big beautiful bill act debt loaded wealth transfer will have to be paid for by the only people left who still pay taxes.

    Forcing out foreign students (literally the best and the brightest in the world) mean an end to the dominant innovation factory the US has been since the 2nd world war. We became that innovation factory after all the brilliant minds in Germany left that autocratic state to coalesce in a free society, something we are running away from every single day now.

    If you haven’t seriously considered an exit strategy it’s not too late to start planning one. I expect at some point some fabrication will close the border for everyone. Otherwise the rich being pandered to right now will have no incentive to stay.

    1. More than half the prospective scientists, doctors, engineers, professors and entrepreneurs in our graduate and professional schools were born overseas. Without them any claim on intellectual leadership is essentially fraudulent. I was in that bus for 40 years. I helped teach these folks. They were generally smarter, more motivated, harder working and generally better than so-called “native students,” and certainly all were better than anyone Trump knows.

  6. I just read Kristi’s Wikipedia page. That is one scary lady we have installed as the one in charge of all the folks who can tear anyone’s life apart on a whim. She killed own dog because she didn’t like its performance.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints