politics putin russia Trump

Witness Donald Trump, Damage Control Expert, Try And Clean Up Some High Treason

"There are a lot of people out there."

"There are a lot of people out there."
This content has been archived. Log in or Subscribe for full access to thousands of archived articles.

6 comments on “Witness Donald Trump, Damage Control Expert, Try And Clean Up Some High Treason

  1. Apart from his mate Vlad, the rest of the world outside his native US has had more than enough of Donald Trump when the Daily Mail, a conservative British tabloid, calls him “Putin’s poodle”. So now he’s trying to save face. It’s an ugly face. His co-author of “Art of the Deal” thinks he’s got dementia. Time to go, Don.

  2. Or, the very “stable genius” must think we are all idiots. Any parent can tell you that he’s acting like a five year old who was caught in the cookie jar. For a television “star” he still doesn’t understand how film works.

  3. The test is largely concluded; the table is set.

    Truth has suffered one of the worst beat downs in US history, and even though certain strained conventions seem to be calling out for help (eg the English language; logic as a foundation for justice; Wikipedia’s definition of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ and the US constitution’s invocation of same as an escape from autocracy, etc) the overlooked fact is that truth is laying unconscious on the sidewalk, blood everywhere.

    We are all guilty of walking by and doing nothing with respect to preserving a notion of truth.

    Heisenberg points out Trump has constructed 3,251 false or misleading claims in the 497 days.

    I suppose that number is a way to describe the size of the blood puddle.

    The test and the table? Well, we have shown that we will elect and tolerate a lying sack of shit. The next money driven, power hungry candidate with just a little self control will make mince meat out of all of us.

    Ha ha. What a fucking joke we have played on ourselves.

    The knock out punch will be the corporate dollar-backed candidate that only lies 1600 times in 500 days. Heck, maybe he/she/it will be really sneaky and only have to lie 30 times in 500 days.

    Constitution? Supreme Court? What’s the point of worrying about a Supreme Court justice’s interpretation of the Constitution when their sense of truth, and of speaking the truth, is nil?

  4. said differently,

    What is the point of discussing/analyzing/arguing anything when there is no benchmark notion of truth?
    Human rights?
    Gun rights? (maniacal laughter in the distance)
    Rights?
    Lefts?
    Someone stole your shit?
    Police?
    On what grounds?
    Grounds? you mean, like precedence? like justice?
    Yes, justice like a quicksand, like a tar pit, maybe like a comet, but probably more like slow roasting hell on earth. Perhaps justice like global warming?
    And the grounds for global warming?
    You mean like 499 scientists pointing at man-accelerated warming for every 1 who argues against?
    Argues? There’s that word again.
    What can it mean, to argue? to be logical?

    On what grounds? Where could these grounds even exist any more?

    The scales of justice?
    What, pray tell, is in that other dish hanging across the balance from me?
    Or can prey tell?

    And what was that old lady on the old TV commercial thinking? The one that could barely carry the tire up to the plate glass window?

  5. Anonymous

    Remind me why any of this is important?

    • Uh, because even a cynic requires a logical system as a reference.

Speak On It

Skip to toolbar