Jamie Dimon Is Taking A Tony Soprano Approach To Bitcoin Futures

I think maybe there’s been some confusion about Jamie Dimon and Bitcoin.

As he will literally tell you if you piss him off, Dimon is “richer than you,” and he didn’t get that way by being an idiot.

Which is why generally speaking, he doesn’t want his employees trading cryptocurrencies when no one is looking. That’s the kind of thing that will get your ass fired, according to Dimon.

 

Make no mistake, Dimon is right about Bitcoin. Government is going to “shut it down”. It is a “fraud” of some stripe (although it seems clear that Jamie was taking some artistic liberties when he applied the term “fraud” back in September). And by some measures, it is “worse than tulips.”

But when I say there’s been some confusion about Dimon and Bitcoin, I’m referring to some of the reactions I’ve seen to a Wall Street Journal article published on Tuesday. In that article, the Journal writes the following:

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive James Dimon has said that if any of the bank’s traders bought or sold bitcoin, he would “fire them in a second.”

But that isn’t stopping the bank from looking at business opportunities in the planned bitcoin-futures market. CME Group Inc., a Chicago-based exchange operator, is seeking to launch bitcoin futures by the end of this year, subject to regulatory approval.

J.P. Morgan is considering whether to provide its clients access to CME’s new bitcoin product through its futures-brokerage unit, a person familiar with the situation said. That means the bank’s customers could use it to place bets on whether the digital currency will rise or fall, while J.P. Morgan collects fees for such services.

Some folks have been quick to lampoon Dimon as though JPMorgan’s deliberations re: Bitcoin futures somehow represent Jamie caving on this issue.

That’s a laughable interpretation. Jamie Dimon is a gangster, goddammit. And this is how gangsters operate. If you don’t understand that, you’ve never been around any real ones.

You can have ideological qualms with a racket and still make money off that racket in the event you can find a way to do it at arm’s length. For instance, you might not want your actual underlings selling [XYZ] drug, because you happen to think that particular drug is abhorrent. But what you damn sure will do is have your underlings extort the people who are selling that drug, because they’re going to be selling it anyway, so why not strong-arm them into paying protection money for the privilege? That is simply how gangsters operate and it is a system that works extremely well (I mean, I wouldn’t know or anything, I’m just going by what I’ve heard).

That’s exactly what Dimon is doing here, although presumably no actual violence will be involved. This is precisely like a damn mob boss banning his soldiers from selling drugs but simultaneously instructing them to extort drug dealers for protection money. And besides, he’s already doing this. Here’s WSJ again:

J.P. Morgan already handles client trades of Bitcoin XBT, an exchange-traded note designed to track the value of the digital currency. The bank has said it doesn’t take positions in the note and simply routes customers’ buy and sell orders electronically to exchanges.

So before you go reading that Wall Street Journal article and thinking that it somehow represents Dimon capitulating, you might want to at least consider the possibility that Dimon is going to actually end up making more money trading Bitcoin than you are, only he doesn’t even have to actually trade it to get rich off of it.

“Salute” bitches…

slute

 

 

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Jamie Dimon Is Taking A Tony Soprano Approach To Bitcoin Futures

  1. Which makes perfect sense. Why take the risks when you are posed to extract the rents? Most of us don’t have the luxury of already being the mob boss.

  2. For me the two best illuminations of why Dimon is so dismissive of BitCoin as anything, but a money trap can be found here:

    https://seekingalpha.com/article/4126873-bitcoin-unknowable-bubble?ifp=0

    and Paulo Santos’ continuing seven article dissection series on BitCoin here:

    https://seekingalpha.com/article/4121499-bitcoin-series-1-basics

    Of course if you don’t want your BitCoin mania high harshed or interrupted by the pertinent relevant facts about BitCoin and cryptocurrencies in general, you probably shouldn’t read either article. I don’t know or have a relationship of any kind with either author anymore than H, just a recognition and respect for quality research and intellect.

  3. Obviously if something is a fraud you might want to short it, so cute article, but not logical. The reason to hedge a short might be the contents of a study that forecasts how long it will take the next 10 million people to get involved long in this thing. It all seems to have the trappings of leading to a CME default. High enough instantenous volatility will default any exchange in the world. The FED won’t touch a crypto generated exchange default…..until contagion makes it too late. Sound familiar?

    • “Obviously if something is a fraud you might want to short it, so cute article, but not logical.”

      yes, “obviously.” because nothing ever goes wrong when you short something that’s a fraud.

      just ask Bill Ackman.

  4. Heisy, first off…Happy Thanksgiving! Right now, I’m giving thanks for your constant lampooning of Bitcoin as well as your other macro commentary. Nothing I hate more than people that agree with me. Makes me nervous.

    I’d like to point out, though, that JP Morgans understandable decision to make money off of us amateurs “stupidity” is precisely why Bitcoin was created. See, whatever exposure JPM is going to give it’s clients via Bitcoin securities, futures, derivatives, “whatever’s” will eventually be replaced by a digital blockchain or currency of some sort that will provide the same exposure…for free.

    Somehow I just find that ironic.

    Lastly, check out John McAfees take on Bitcoin via CNBC. Between McAfee and Dimon, Who is more likely to look to the future versus maintain the status quo? McAfee also has a few good thoughts for you on your assertion that governments will “shut this down” which, the more I research cryptos, doesn’t appear to be possible, in my view, particularly if a real peer-to-peer network takes off. As McAfee says, “they don’t have nearly enough enforcement people to enforce any such move.”

      • Yup, sure do! But come on Heisy, you know the guy knows a thing or two about technology and innovation, particularly on the internet. Far more than you, me, and Dimon!

        Also, a basket case on an island and may have murdered his neighbor? Someone alert Sharon that she’s in danger!

  5. Pingback: Jamie Dimon Is Taking A Tony Soprano Approach To Bitcoin Futures — – Notes From Owl Creek Farm

Speak On It